My work is concerned with the context of creativity, transition and the future cultural dialogue between fashion, technology and art.
I feel that in contemporary aestheticism, genre is irrelevant, and division is unnecessary in the current creative climate.
Who cares what something is labelled under? it's about the ideas.
In my work I want to embrace the bodacious, irrespective of its field, by subverting tradition for rule-breaking and technology romance.
Looking at artisan Vs. technology
Utilizing hijacked technology in conjunction with artisanal hands, traditional visual forms are superseded and articulate relationships between past and future .
A sort of ‘Future-tive’ way of moving forward. 'Fabricateing a technologized environment directly to the surface of the body'
Embracing the creative domain as an avenue for articulating a form of maverick hypper-culture,
Aiming to preclude any set ‘constitutes’ and recontextualize practice.
a cross disciplinary pastiche
Creative figures, such as ; nick cave, stellark, lucy mcrae, wrecking crew orchestra, Andrew Thomas huang, hussean chalayan , sha sha higby, agata olek, iris van herpen
I feel their freedom in practice debases stereotypes and limitations within genre.
its really about a refusal to quantify work as belonging to either art or fashion .
Driving my work through questioning;
What role has innovation in Future-tive technology and rise of the contemporary artisan had on expansion of creative classification?
How has an evolution in the contemporary art/fashion nexus recontextualized past and future genre based limitations and allowed a liberation from definition?
How is today’s contemporary climate embracing creative escapism as a tacit creative domain and an avenue for articulating maverick hybrid culture?
